Mozilla thinks they are very cute
May. 27th, 2019 10:27 pm
Element Description <b>The HTML Bring Attention To element ( <b>) is used to draw the reader's attention to the element's contents, which are not otherwise granted special importance.<u>The HTML Unarticulated Annotation Element ( <u>) represents a span of inline text which should be rendered in a way that indicates that it has a non-textual annotation.
Some people naming things think they are very cute. Mozilla, you know that <b> stands for “bold” and <u> stands for “underline”. I know that <b> stands for “bold” and <u> stands for “underline”. You, reading this post right now, probably previously knew that <b> stands for “bold” and <u> stands for “underline”.
What's next, calling <i> the “Indicate distinction element”?
To be clear, I'm not actually mad at whoever renamed these things, and I get the reason why, but it does seem rather silly.
no subject
Date: 2019-05-28 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-05-29 11:29 pm (UTC)Ah, so the w3 consortium did the thing. I don't know why we can't just have
<b>and<u>be treated like, say,<font>? They don't seem to have the plethora of legitimate uses that<i>does. (The appropriate tag for a species name is not going to be<em>.)And yeah, making things be nice for screen reader users is important.
no subject
Date: 2020-07-24 07:51 am (UTC)I think for species what might be looking for is <cite> (though checking Mozilla's page I see "and so forth" is the only cover there is for that, lol).